THE
HOUSE OF MIRTH
Edith
Wharton is a storyteller who shows characters trapped
within a system. This is advanced storytelling and
the most challenging kind of fiction writing you can
do. Wharton is a master at showing that the real currency
in a close, hierarchical society is status, not money.
But
in The House of Mirth, Wharton makes the deadly mistake
found in much of advanced fiction: creating a passive
character. Lily Bart simply reacts to the attacks
of others around her. Wharton compounds the mistake
by making her hero foolish. That means that the plot
is stripped of almost all turns. The hero is beaten
on for the entire story and then falls. But we've
known the final destructionwas coming for a long time.
About the only element of story interest here is the
fact that Lily's ultimate downfall is caused by her
own misplaced sense of right.
Terence
Davies' adaptation makes the weaknesses of Wharton's
story worse. This film defines slow. Wharton doesn't
have to be this dull, as The Age of Innocence proved.
Here everything is pounded into the ground.
Some
important lessons: if you write about characters within
a system, make your hero active, even if he or she
fails to defeat the larger system. Keep the scenes
tight. And remember, this is film, which uses the
cut, and that means that the juxtaposition of scenes
is more important than what is in any individual scene.
The placement of one scene before or after another
should create new information.
|
|
|