| Related Products: | |
| If you want to write, direct or produce a | |
| film like the one featured: | |
| Software | |
![]() |
Crime Add-on |
| Classes | ![]() |
Crime Audio Course
|
| TRUBY BREAKDOWNS |
![]() |
The Coen brothers are the moral philosophers of American film. They have one subject: moral accounting. That’s why no matter what genre they seem to work in, they’re always doing crime stories. The classic crime story is a heavyweight fight between a master criminal and a master cop. The middle of the story has an intense punch/counter-punch as each takes his best shots. When one wins at the end, usually the cop, we get the pleasure of a good heavyweight fight. That’s fine for a lot of screenwriters. But the Coens have always known that you have to transcend your genre, because then your script or film is not only more popular, it has a chance to be great. A transcendent crime story isn’t just about catching a criminal. It’s about tallying up what is owed over the course of a lifetime, with life and death consequences. The Coen’s Blood Simple, Miller’s Crossing, Fargo, No Country for Old Men and True Grit all play out this brutal accounting system. True Grit is set in the old west, but it’s not a Western. The classic Western is all about nation building, transforming wilderness into civilization. Shane is a classic Western. |
|
True Grit is crime in western clothes. Tom Chaney has murdered a girl’s
father and he must pay with his life. The law is supposed to handle the moral
accounting in society. But this time the law fails. So it falls to headstrong, 14-
year-old Mattie to make sure the job is done. This gives the film a clear, strong
desire line. And that is a crucial benefit when the hero and her allies, Marshall
Rooster Cogburn and Agent LaBoeuf, go on a journey to track the killer down.
Accounting is also central to Mattie’s plan. This film is filled with bargaining. She’s a ferocious bargainer for her father’s horses. And she refuses to let Rooster shirk his responsibility. This is the deal we made, she insists, and you must keep your word. Though essentially a crime story, True Grit uses the myth structure, with its series of tests on the road, to unfold the story and play out the accounting. As in the best myth stories, the hero brings her “family” – Rooster and LaBoeuf – along for the ride. The dramatic opposition comes from the series of bad guys they must fight on the road. But the most important opposition thematically is within the family. Each conflict with the bad guys allows the family members to tally up his or her proper payment to the others. The true endpoint of the story is not whether they bring Tom Chaney to justice. It is whether these three main characters – Mattie, Rooster and LaBoeuf – will come to understand the true worth of each of the others. In the final scene, Mattie has one last payment she must make to old Rooster. She can’t make it, and for someone with such a strong moral code this is tragic. It’s not the ending we want in this movie. But it’s the ending the movie has to have. The Coens never sermonize. Their knowledge of the screenwriting craft is too great for that. Study True Grit and the rest of the Coen canon to learn how to convert your moral vision into characters and plot. Those techniques are one of the main ways you tell the world that you are a master of the craft. Comments
Jim B. 20 Jun 2011, 05:35
Alon, don't be mislead into believing all main characters are supposed to
change. There are those who are steadfast who don't, but cause others to
change around them. The Fugitive is a good example: Dr. Richard Kimble
doesn't change, but we surely wouldn't think Agent Gerard to be the POV of
the story. William Wallace is another good example of a main character who
doesn't change, but has an impact on Robert the Bruce who ultimately
becomes Braveheart. These are concepts that I think Dramatica does a
pretty good job explaining, but True Grit, from that perspective, comes off
as meaningless. I like how John's interpretation of the ending gives the
film meaning that's not apparent in some other analysis forms.
Stafford "Doc" Williamson 27 May 2011, 13:37
There are other mythological elements in the story, too, Mattie's journey
is a kind of "cast out of heaven" initiating event, and she seems largely
unchanged in the "traveling angel" tradition (i.e. Peter Falk mysteries as
the shambling detective), but similarly, while the "angel" in this
structure remains superficially unchanged, the angel's change is in the
discovery that human nature is more complex than the absolute morality of
black and white, good and evil. She starts with an opinion of disgust with
the morally bankrupt lawman she hires to be her avenging angel, but evolves
to have admiration and love for him as he too is evolved by the events and
his own reactions to the other characters. Yes, Rooster goes through the
more classic reformation from drunken reprobate to a man of true character
but the Coen brothers take the time to give all of their characters nuance
and depth of a rounded character, not unlike how Dickens gives the
seemingly nondescript name of "the aged P" to Wemmick's father in "Great
Expectations", yet the detail of his needing help at church to don his
gloves causes this passing portrait to penetrate into fully sculpted
individual in our memories. The story is about Cogburn's transformation,
too, but it blends in the self-discovery of a "road picture" overlaid on
the "who-done-it" of the crime mystery and revenge tragedy. One of the
main reasons that "these is no formula for a hit movie" is that fact that
the great ones blend and transcend, which is one of the main elements that
makes them great.
Sincerely, Stafford "Doc" Williamson
Alon 01 Mar 2011, 12:48
Great breakdown as always, however one thing bothered me the whole movie
and kept me from really getting emotionally involved, the girl doesn't
change at all . She starts as a courages person and ends up exactly the
same. The ones that do change are her two friends. It kind'a made me think
the hero was supposed to be the marshal and that if the story was told from
his p.o.v then it would be a lot better.
What do you think?
Powered by Scriptsmill Comments Script
|
|